The Undertaker's 6 day Title reign in 1991

So this title lose by Hogan was a way to get the title off of him, with of course not making him look weak. I believe the ultimate plan was to give the title to Flair, but I don't think they wanted to have Hogan lose to Flair. So the Undertaker would be used for

In this particular situation, its not that Hogan was politicing to regain his title, because technically he never won the rematch. In fact, Hogan did not regain the wwe title for 16 months. This was a tough time for the wwe, with the reports that McMahon was making the wrestlers take steroids and Hogan at the center. Im not sure if this was starting to trickle in at about this time, but I know for sure come February that the wwe was feeling the full weight of this.

So this title lose by Hogan was a way to get the title off of him, with of course not making him look weak. I believe the ultimate plan was to give the title to Flair, but I don't think they wanted to have Hogan lose to Flair. So the Undertaker would be used for this purpose, to win the title from Hogan with help from Flair, only to lose it due to controversial fashion 6 days later, and have the title vacated. I believe Taker was chosen because he was the only wrestler who's momentum would not be stopped by only having a 6 day reign, and of course it only got stronger.

ncG1vNJzZmien6fCrr%2BNsKmeq6Shsru7zZ5lnKedZMGpvsSam6xnpJ2ybsHNnZyrrJGgsrO%2FjG9knZmpYsGqwMueZKudmZy7brXNZmhycWFjhXeCl3Bm

 Share!